Featured|

Secret hackers Anonymous neither leaderless nor anarchic

The hacktivist group calling itself Anonymous isn’t quite as it’s been represented. since it came out of the shadows in support of WikiLeaks.

Like all fairytales, there’s a dark secret lurking behind the ‘anarchic and leaderless’ initial impression given about Anonymous, the hacker group which laid waste to mega-sites such as PayPal, Amazon, Visa, MasterCard and others who dumped their services to WikiLeaks when the US  turned the heat up on Julian Assange.

Members of the group have contacted a well-known UK newspaper which now describes the groups as far less amorphous and far more hierarchical than was first assumed. At the top of the still anonymous tree are a dozen hidden and highly skilled hackers, with the lower branches composed of thousands of computers and their owners scattered worldwide used in DDoS attacks.

Attacks are closely coordinated and timed, and are not just aimed at Wikileaks detractors, although that seems to be the focus at present and likely to continue.
The US website Gawker was attacked last weekend, with its 1.3 million user’s email addresses and passwords made public, which spawned a Twitter spam attack now under FBI investigation.

Operation Payback, coordinated during the last 10 days, hit all the sites which had cut off services to WikiLeaks, leaving it with no way to receive donations, on which it survives. Insiders are looking for the attacks to accelerate over the Christmas holidays, given the younger profile of Anonymous’s members. It seems it’s not just Santa who has ‘little helpers’ at this time of year.

According to an Anonymous member who, of course, wishes to remain anonymous, the groups ‘control and command centres’ are invite only.  He adds, ‘if you prove yourself trustworthy, you’re in, if not, you’re out’, continuing the group is not elitist but has to ensure the press and law-enforcement agencies don’t see who gives the orders.

Looking at developments so far and ignoring the conspiracy theories, if this is cyber-war it’s to be hoped free speech isn’t the first casualty.

Author's Google+ page
  • Share this post:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • anonymous

    stick to car rentals. you aren’t very good at fact finding.

  • Anonymous

    That article in the UK paper is factually incorrect, one can speculate about any potential leadership within Anonymous, but the technical facts in the article are so far off I hesitate to believe the rest. They say Gawkers site had above average security, when in fact the owners password was 6 numbers and he used that password for every online account he had, the users password database was encrypted with DES, an encryption method so weak it was abandoned over a decade ago. Also an expert was quoted as saying Anonymous had about a thousand core members, well the expert in question has come out and said she had never said any such thing and had asked the paper to retract their false quote and they have yet to do so.

  • Ella

    How they get people in? Hacking them, blackmailing them, and if you report it to the police, you get “Operation Payback”, which is Gangstalking. It’s CIA.

In the Press
  • The Sunday Post Martin Lewis of moneysavingexpert.com: Early booking using comparison sites including Carrentals.co.uk can slash up to 70%
  • The Daily Mail For the best deals, use price comparison websites such as Carrentals.co.uk.
  • The Daily Telegraph Check out car hire comparison sites such as Carrentals.co.uk to see the prices on offer at dozens of car hire companies.
*
*
*
carrentals.co.uk

Cookies on Carrentals.co.uk

Copyright 2003 ASAP Ventures Ltd

All rights reserved

Registered in England and Wales

Company number 4278063

Registered office address

1 The Square, Lightwater, Surrey, GU18 5SS